Bank of America

Redesigning one of America's most used banking websites.

Role

UX/UI Designer

timeline

10 Weeks

The Problem

A platform built for scale not for people.

Bank of America is one of the most widely used banking platforms in the United States — and the primary bank for millions of international students. But despite serving 67 million customers, the website hadn't seen a meaningful redesign in years. The interface was functional. But it was frustrating — especially for users who weren't already familiar with the system.

01

Inconsistent Design

Fonts, spacing, and layouts varied wildly across pages — making it impossible to build a mental model of the interface.

02

Non-Clickable Logo

The BofA logo didn't navigate home — a basic usability expectation broken on every single page of the site.

03

Confusing Navigation

Multiple paths to the same task — especially bill payments — created decision fatigue and wasted time.

04

No Customization

Users couldn't surface the features they used most. Everything was buried equally with no way to prioritize.

05

Poor Visual Balance

Dense content with no visual hierarchy made pages feel overwhelming — especially for less tech-savvy users.

06

Overwhelming Content

Account and credit card pages packed too much information into too little space with no clear focal point.

Research Snapshot

Finding the friction before fixing it

Bank of America is one of the most widely used banking platforms in the United States — and the primary bank for millions of international students. But despite serving 67 million customers, the website hadn't seen a meaningful redesign in years. The interface was functional. But it was frustrating — especially for users who weren't already familiar with the system.

67M+

Customers on a platform that hadn't been meaningfully redesigned in years

5

Research methods used to uncover real user friction

6

Critical usability problems identified through heuristic evaluation

5

Users tested across 2 rounds of cognitive walkthroughs

What Was Broken

We didn't rely on assumptions. Each method was chosen to surface a different layer of friction — from observable behaviour to systemic design gaps.

👁️

Observations

Watched 4 users complete core tasks in real time — capturing navigation patterns, hesitation points, and workarounds.

🎙️

User Interviews

Interviewed 2 existing BofA users with open-ended questions to understand frustrations, mental models, and unmet needs.

🗒️

Scenarios & Task Analysis

Defined 2 primary scenarios — fund transfer and appointment scheduling — to map the full task flow end to end.

🏦

Competitive Analysis

Benchmarked BofA against 5 competitor banks including Chase and PNC — identifying missing features and superior patterns.

📊

Heuristic Evaluations (UAR)

Conducted a structured usability aspect report — rating each problem by frequency, impact, and persistence to prioritise fixes.

Intended Users

Designing for real people, not assumptions

We created two personas that represented the full spectrum of BofA's user base — from someone who calls the bank rather than using the website, to someone who uses every feature available.

Design Decisions

Every choice had a reason

Good design isn't just about how it looks — it's about why it looks that way. Here's the thinking behind the most important decisions we made, from brand identity to task flow structure.

Key Decision

This was an academic project with a clear mandate be experimental, challenge assumptions, and reimagine without constraint. We deliberately moved away from BofA's existing red to explore how a fresh visual identity could make banking feel more approachable and modern. Blue brought clarity, calm, and a sense of trust without the urgency that red carries exactly the tone we wanted for a user-friendly redesign.

This was an academic project with a clear mandate be experimental, challenge assumptions, and reimagine without constraint. We deliberately moved away from BofA's existing red to explore how a fresh visual identity could make banking feel more approachable and modern. Blue brought clarity, calm, and a sense of trust without the urgency that red carries exactly the tone we wanted for a user-friendly redesign.

Existing: BofA Red #e31837

Familiar but carries urgency — not ideal for calm UX

Decision: Blue #2b5eb8

Modern, calm, approachable — builds digital trust

Added: Navy #032169

Depth and hierarchy for typography

3 Task Flows Lo-fi to Hi-fi

Task 01 Account Dashboard & Credit Card View

Lo-Fi Sketch

Hi-Fi Screen

Recent transactions on homepage

Most-checked information was buried 2 pages deep. Brought it to the surface.

Added income + spending summary

Users needed monthly context at a glance — not just a balance number.

Credit card progress bar

Replaced raw numbers with a visual indicator of credit utilisation — faster to read.

Task 02 Money Transfer

Lo-Fi Sketch

Hi-Fi Screen

Replaced arrows with account tiles

Users confused arrows for buttons. Dual tile layout makes From/To selection unambiguous.

Simplified to one screen

Original flow had 5+ steps. Consolidated into a single form with OTP confirmation.

Clear transfer type selector

Between BofA accounts, other banks, and Zelle — each option now has its own distinct path.

Task 03 Appointment Scheduling

Lo-Fi Sketch

Hi-Fi Screen

Topic cards replace dropdown

Visual topic cards are faster to scan than a dense dropdown with 10+ options.

Map-integrated location picker

Users wanted to see branch proximity visually — not just a list of addresses.

Progress bar across 3 steps

No feedback during the original flow left users unsure how far along they were.

Key Screens

The redesign, up close.

Three tasks. Three flows rebuilt from scratch. Here's what the final design looks like — and the thinking behind each screen.

  1. Account Dashboard

From cluttered overview to clear command centre

What changed: Balance, spending summary, credit card utilisation bar, and recent transactions — all surfaced on one page. No more digging.

  1. Appointment Scheduling

From a buried feature to a guided experience

What changed: Topic cards replace a dense dropdown. Map shows branch proximity visually. Progress bar keeps users oriented across 3 steps.

  1. Money Transfer

From confusing flow to one clean form

What changed: Arrows replaced with explicit account tiles. 5 steps consolidated into one screen. Transfer type — BofA, other banks, Zelle — each has a clear distinct path.

Outcome & Recommendations

What we learned. What changed.

After two rounds of cognitive walkthroughs with real users, the redesign showed clear improvement across all three task flows. Here's what the testing revealed — and what we'd do next.

Task Completion

Task Completion

Both test users — Tony and Sahith — successfully completed account viewing, fund transfer, and appointment scheduling without critical errors in the redesigned flow.

Intuitive Navigation

Intuitive Navigation

Users no longer hesitated at the homepage. The restructured dashboard surfaced the right information immediately — reducing time spent searching for basic account info.

Users felt confident

Users felt confident

Qualitative feedback showed users felt less anxious completing transfers. The explicit account tiles and OTP confirmation gave clear signals at every step of the flow.

Iteration Improved

Iteration Improved

Each round of testing directly changed the design. The transfer tile selector, the progress bar, and the topic cards all came from user feedback — not assumptions.

Recommendations for next iteration

What we'd do differently next time: This was an academic project with a 10-week timeline. With more time and access, here's where we'd take the redesign further.

1

Customisable dashboard

Users wanted to pin their most-used features. An Activity Centre with drag-and-drop personalisation would directly address this.

2

More user interviews

We interviewed 6 users. A broader sample — especially older users and non-English speakers — would surface additional friction points we likely missed.

3

Accessibility audit

Colour contrast, screen reader compatibility, and keyboard navigation weren't fully tested. A dedicated accessibility pass would be the next priority.

4

Mobile-first redesign

The redesign focused on the desktop web experience. Given how many users access banking on mobile, a native app redesign is the logical next step.

Personal Reflection

This was the most process-intensive project I'd done and the most revealing. The biggest lesson wasn't about design. It was about listening. The arrow-vs-tile problem on the transfer screen wasn't something we anticipated. A user pointed it out in 30 seconds of testing. That single observation changed our entire approach to the transfer flow.

What We'd Improve

Research before wireframes

Jumping to solutions before understanding the problem adds weeks of rework. Every assumption we tested saved us time later.

Test with the right users

ony and Sahith represented opposite ends of the spectrum. Designing for both forced us to make decisions that worked universally — not just for power users.

Small fixes, big impact

The most impactful changes weren't the visual redesign — they were fixing the non-clickable logo, simplifying the nav, and surfacing transactions. Simple. Obvious in hindsight.

That's a wrap on Bank of America

Liked what you saw?

Whether you want the full story... or Just want to say Hello


I'd Love to hear from you

Next project